Launching Data Studio: from vision to INBOUND ’25.
One approachable workspace for building, cleaning and enriching CRM data, launched on schedule and now used by 400+ portals spending credits, up 292% since September 2025.
Hero image
Company / product
HubSpot, Data Studio (Data Hub)
My role
Senior Product Designer, UX DRI and top-priority (P0) strategy owner for Data Studio
Preparing CRM data meant moving between separate, technical tools, and few customers used the existing Datasets product. HubSpot needed one approachable workspace to anchor the Data Hub relaunch at INBOUND ’25.
Solution
I led UX from early discovery through launch. I defined the design principles and what “approachable” meant, co-led the vision workshops, and owned every AI experience: Smart Columns, the no-code editors and the Breeze assistant. All of them run on one shared, panel-based interaction system.
Impact
400+ portals spending credits in Data Studio (+292% since September 2025)
Business context: HubSpot was relaunching Data Hub, and data preparation (building, cleaning and enriching datasets) was a core pillar of it. Datasets, the existing tool, had low adoption. The goal was a single workspace launched at INBOUND ’25, HubSpot’s biggest annual event, with a target of 5x Datasets adoption by 2026.
Customer problem: Preparing CRM data meant moving between separate tools, and the work felt technical and intimidating to non-specialists. [Who the core users were (RevOps, marketing ops, admins), and what they were doing instead, such as spreadsheets, exports or third-party tools.]
Evidence: [Findings from early discovery and concept research, e.g. number of interviews, where users struggled, and Datasets adoption before launch.]
“[Customer quote about how hard or fragmented data prep was]”
Problem statement: How might we make preparing and enriching CRM data approachable for non-technical users, so that more customers build datasets and get value from AI features?
Before state
The fragmented “before” journey across separate tools.
My role and constraints
I owned: The end-to-end UX strategy for Data Studio, and I made the final UX decisions across the related product teams. I co-led the vision workshops, defined the core problems and design principles, and owned every AI experience: Smart Columns, the no-code editors and the Breeze assistant. For each of those, I set the KPIs, interaction model and success metrics.
I partnered on: Workstreams and focus areas with Data Hub leadership; beta and pre-INBOUND milestones with PMs; a single Data Agent experience across Data Studio, CRM and Workflows with the teams that own those products.
Constraints
Time: A fixed public launch date at INBOUND ’25.
Organizational: Several product teams, each with its own priorities, had to ship one product together.
Platform: AI features ran on the new usage-based billing (UBB) credit system, and the work had to fit the HubSpot design system.
Complexity: Workflows spanned many user states, from empty datasets to errors to credit limits.
Process
Discover (2024)
I ran early discovery and concept research and mapped how customers clean their data today.
Key insight: [The finding that shaped the product, e.g. users didn’t think of themselves as “data people” and needed guidance rather than power tools.]
Research artifact
Discovery synthesis and the data cleaning journey map.
Define (late 2024)
I wrote the Data Studio design principles and led an approachability exercise to turn “make it approachable” into specific, testable goals. I also helped leadership set up workstreams and focus areas.
Framing
The approachability exercise board (FigJam) and the design principles.
Align (spring 2025)
I co-led vision workshops, including a Summit workshop on 5/14/25, and walked Data Hub leadership through the vision flow.
Vision
The workshop board and vision flow, cropped.
Validate and ship (mid-2025 – INBOUND ’25)
I tested concepts with prototypes, ran the beta, tracked pre-INBOUND milestones, and cleared blockers to keep teams on schedule. [Number of beta customers and what changed because of them.]
Prototype
Prototype screens with beta findings.
Key decisions and tradeoffs
How to structure AI actions
Options
One-off UI per feature / a shared system
What I chose and why
A panel-based action library that works across workflows and user states, so new AI features drop into one consistent pattern.
Tradeoff accepted
More design work upfront, and less freedom for each team.
Where the Data Agent lives
Options
A separate experience per product / a unified agent
What I chose and why
One Data Agent experience across Data Studio, CRM and Workflows, so users learn it once.
Tradeoff accepted
Coordinating across several teams slowed some decisions.
[What made it into the INBOUND launch]
Options
[Full vision / a smaller first release]
What I chose and why
[What you cut or deferred, and why]
Tradeoff accepted
[Tradeoff]
How I got buy-in: Vision workshops, a walkthrough for Data Hub leadership, and working prototypes gave teams a shared picture of “what good looks like” before anyone committed to a build. [A moment where a prototype or workshop changed someone’s mind.]
The solution
One workspace for preparing data
Building, cleaning and enriching datasets now happen in one place, designed around the approachability principles so non-specialists can work with confidence. [One or two specifics, e.g. guided empty states or no-code editors.]
Final screen
The Data Studio workspace, with 2–3 numbered callouts.
AI built into the workflow: Smart Columns and the Breeze assistant
Smart Columns let users enrich or transform data with AI and web search, right inside the dataset. I designed their credit usage, error states and billing experience, so users understand what AI actions do and what they cost.
Smart Columns
Smart Columns setup.
A scalable interaction system
A panel-based action library covers complex workflows and user states, backed by component audits and a regular design review rhythm. It gives every Data Studio team one consistent pattern, and the same Data Agent experience appears in CRM and Workflows.
Patterns
The action library and panel pattern sheet.
Impact and results
Portals spending credits in Data Studio, up 292% since September 2025
400+
Portals activating datasets
~1.9K
Credits spent through Smart Columns
320K+
Data Studio launched on schedule at INBOUND ’25. Adoption grew quickly: 400+ portals were spending credits in it within months, a 292% increase since September 2025. Customers have spent ~1.3M credits in total, and adding a credit estimate later lifted Data Studio activations ~12% (see the Credit Transparency case study).
Qualitative impact: My manager wrote that the post-launch numbers “reflect real, tangible business impact.” Adjacent teams in Data Platform and Marketing Hub went on to adopt UI patterns from Data Studio.
“[Quote from a beta customer or PM about the work]”
Reflection and what’s next
What I’d do differently: I’d balance the big upfront framing with smaller, faster changes. Getting a high-fidelity picture of “what good looks like” in front of teams sooner would have built alignment faster than long workshops did.
What I learned: On a multi-team launch, the shared system (principles, the action library, operating rhythms) matters as much as any single screen. It is what keeps the product coherent after launch.
What happened next: After launch, I worked on credit transparency, which lifted activations ~12%, and on a Data Management overview page to make features easier to find. [Status of the 5x Datasets goal.]